Every GRC platform is priced and designed for a company with a security team. Most of the businesses that carry a compliance obligation do not have one.
Agrimi is an AI assessor that reads a small business's real evidence, grades it against the framework's own published guidance, and tells them how to close the gaps. It is running in production today. We are raising to put it in front of the market that needs it.
Third-party assessment is no longer required for CMMC Level 2. Tens of thousands of defense suppliers now grade themselves against a rubric they have never been trained on, and attest to the result under their own name. The requirement did not get smaller. It moved onto the supplier, without the assessor who used to catch mistakes.
Continuous-monitoring platforms assume forty SaaS integrations and a full-time compliance hire. A 30-person machine shop with a DoD contract has neither. They end up in spreadsheets, or paying five figures to a consultant for work that is mostly interpretation.
Most GRC AI generates narratives, which produces confident documents that fail audits. Reading real evidence against a published rubric and grading it is a different task, and a far more defensible one. It is also the expensive part of every consulting engagement.
We would rather show you a product with a customer on it than a deck with a roadmap in it.
The platform runs today at SofWerx, a Defense Industrial Base organization, as the foundational customer. Not a prototype, not a design partner LOI. Real evidence, real assessments.
CMMC L1 and L2, NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001:2022, and CIS Controls v8, with the published cross-framework mappings built in. Evidence uploaded once satisfies controls in all of them.
One plan, every framework, every feature. Vanta and Drata start around $10-11k a year and target companies with security teams. We are not competing on features at the top of the market; we are serving the bottom of it, which nobody has priced for.
Built without outside capital. That is the reason for this page, and it is also the reason the burn is small and the product is real before the raise rather than after it.
Not because the ideas are secret, but because each one costs an incumbent revenue they already book.
The customer owns the facts. The AI owns the interpretation. Every output is reviewable before it enters the record. This is the opposite of one-click SSP generation, and it is why the output survives scrutiny.
Every framework, every feature, one price. No tiers, no enterprise call. SMB practitioners read tiered pricing as adversarial and flat pricing as honest, and it collapses the sales cycle to a signup.
Per-managed-client billing and one dashboard across a book of business. Compliance-as-a-service is among the fastest-growing MSP categories, and most GRC platforms treat it as an afterthought. It is our distribution channel.
Do the work once, satisfy four frameworks. For an SMB chasing CMMC while a commercial customer asks for ISO, that is the difference between one project and four.
Deck and financials on request
